Metrics That Matter in Objection Handling with GenAI Agents for High-Velocity SDR Teams
This comprehensive guide explores the key metrics for effective objection handling in high-velocity SDR teams leveraging GenAI agents. It covers both foundational and advanced KPIs, operational best practices, and real-world case studies to help sales leaders drive data-driven performance and pipeline velocity.



Introduction: The Evolution of Objection Handling with GenAI
In the high-stakes world of enterprise sales, Sales Development Representatives (SDRs) operate in fast-paced environments where every interaction counts. One of the most critical aspects of their role is objection handling—a nuanced skill that can make or break a deal. With the emergence of Generative AI (GenAI) agents, the landscape of objection handling is undergoing a transformation. These AI-powered assistants not only support SDRs with real-time insights and recommended responses but also generate a new set of actionable metrics that leaders can harness to drive performance.
This article delves deep into the metrics that matter most when evaluating objection handling effectiveness in teams leveraging GenAI. By focusing on these data-driven insights, sales leaders can optimize strategies, coach teams more effectively, and ultimately accelerate pipeline velocity.
Why Metrics Matter in High-Velocity SDR Environments
High-velocity SDR teams face unique challenges: high lead volumes, rapid touch points, and the constant pressure to meet quotas. Traditional sales metrics—like call volume and conversion rates—remain important, but the integration of GenAI agents introduces new dimensions to performance measurement. Metrics now extend beyond simple activity counts to include AI-driven insights on conversation quality, objection patterns, resolution rates, and more.
Understanding and leveraging the right metrics enables managers to:
Pinpoint coaching opportunities for individual SDRs
Identify process bottlenecks and common objection themes
Refine GenAI agent prompts and algorithms for higher effectiveness
Increase pipeline velocity by reducing stalled opportunities
Core Metrics for Objection Handling with GenAI Agents
1. Objection Occurrence Rate
This metric measures how often SDRs encounter objections across all conversations. GenAI agents can automatically tag and categorize objections by type—such as budget, authority, timing, or need—providing granular visibility into the most common friction points.
Formula: (Number of objections / Total conversations) x 100
Why it matters: High occurrence rates may indicate misalignment between outreach messaging and target personas, or insufficient qualification criteria.
2. Objection Resolution Rate
This key metric tracks the percentage of objections that SDRs are able to resolve successfully with the assistance of GenAI agents. It is a direct indicator of both agent efficacy and SDR skill development.
Formula: (Number of resolved objections / Total objections) x 100
Why it matters: A rising resolution rate signals improving objection handling efficiency and, often, better pipeline progression.
3. Time to Resolution
Speed is critical in high-velocity sales. This metric measures the average time from when an objection is raised to when it is resolved, with or without GenAI intervention.
Formula: (Sum of resolution times) / (Total objections resolved)
Why it matters: Shorter resolution times typically correlate with higher SDR confidence, better GenAI recommendations, and smoother buyer experiences.
4. GenAI Recommendation Adoption Rate
Not all SDRs use GenAI-generated suggestions equally. This metric tracks the percentage of GenAI recommendations that SDRs actually use during live objection handling.
Formula: (Number of AI suggestions used / Number of AI suggestions provided) x 100
Why it matters: High adoption rates indicate trust in the AI system, while low rates may highlight training gaps or AI prompt misalignment.
5. Conversation Sentiment Shift
GenAI-powered sentiment analysis can track how the tone of a conversation changes after an objection is raised and addressed. This metric provides qualitative insight into the impact of SDR and GenAI responses.
Formula: (Average sentiment post-objection - Average sentiment pre-objection)
Why it matters: Positive sentiment shifts suggest effective handling and increased buyer trust.
6. Follow-Up Engagement Rate
After overcoming objections, the next critical step is ensuring continued buyer engagement. This metric tracks the percentage of prospects who respond positively to follow-up communications after an objection has been addressed.
Formula: (Number of positive follow-ups / Number of objections handled) x 100
Why it matters: High rates validate the effectiveness of both objection handling and subsequent nurturing strategies.
7. Coachability Index
This composite metric assesses how quickly SDRs improve objection handling skills after receiving feedback, both from managers and GenAI-driven coaching modules.
Formula: Weighted improvement across objection metrics post-coaching intervention
Why it matters: High coachability scores signal a team's readiness to adapt and drive continuous improvement.
Advanced Metrics: Unlocking Deeper Insights
8. AI-Driven Objection Pattern Recognition
GenAI agents are uniquely positioned to identify evolving objection trends over time. By clustering objection types and correlating them with outcomes, leaders can anticipate market shifts and proactively adjust messaging.
Example: An increase in budget-related objections during economic downturns.
Action: Refine value propositions and training based on emerging patterns.
9. Objection Escalation Rate
Some objections require escalation to account executives or sales engineers. Tracking the frequency and outcome of such escalations helps optimize resource allocation and highlights potential product or process gaps.
Formula: (Number of objections escalated / Total objections) x 100
Why it matters: High escalation rates may indicate complex buyer needs or insufficient SDR enablement.
10. Closed-Lost Reason Attribution
Integrating GenAI insights with CRM data allows for precise attribution of closed-lost deals to specific objection types. This metric ties objection handling effectiveness directly to revenue outcomes.
Formula: (Number of closed-losts due to specific objection / Total closed-losts) x 100
Why it matters: Provides a feedback loop for product, marketing, and enablement teams to address core issues.
11. Objection Handling Consistency Score
This metric evaluates how uniformly SDRs apply best practices and GenAI recommendations across similar objection scenarios.
Formula: Standard deviation of objection handling outcomes across team members
Why it matters: Low variance indicates strong process adherence and scalable outcomes.
Operationalizing Metrics: Best Practices for SDR Leaders
Establish Clear Baselines
Before optimizing, it’s essential to establish performance baselines for each metric. Leverage historical data and run pilot programs with GenAI agents to set realistic targets tailored to your team’s market and motion.
Integrate Metrics into Coaching Cadences
Metrics are only valuable when they inform actionable coaching. Incorporate objection handling KPIs into weekly reviews, 1:1s, and team standups. Use GenAI-generated call summaries and analytics to spotlight both strengths and blind spots for each SDR.
Align GenAI Training with Real-World Scenarios
GenAI agents are only as good as the training data and prompts they receive. Regularly update algorithms and suggested responses based on evolving objection patterns, call recordings, and SDR feedback. Encourage a feedback loop between human and AI for continuous improvement.
Drive Cross-Functional Collaboration
Share objection trend data and closed-lost reason analyses with product, marketing, and customer success teams. This enables organization-wide learning and faster iteration on messaging, product roadmap, and enablement content.
Real-World Example: Metrics in Action
A global SaaS provider implemented GenAI agents across its SDR team. By tracking objection occurrence and resolution rates, leadership identified that pricing objections spiked during Q2. Analysis revealed that GenAI suggestions for budget objections were underutilized. After refining AI prompts and coaching SDRs to better leverage recommendations, the team saw a 22% increase in objection resolution and a 15% reduction in time to resolution within two quarters. Importantly, closed-lost attribution for budget dropped by 30%, directly impacting pipeline health.
Common Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them
Overemphasizing Quantity vs. Quality: High call or objection volumes are meaningless without successful outcomes. Always pair volume metrics with effectiveness KPIs.
Neglecting AI Adoption Barriers: Low recommendation adoption rates often stem from lack of trust or poor alignment. Invest in user training and continuous AI improvement.
Failing to Close the Feedback Loop: Metrics should inform iterative changes to both AI systems and SDR processes, not just reporting dashboards.
Ignoring Sentiment and Buyer Experience: Resolution rates alone don’t capture buyer trust. Always measure sentiment shifts post-objection handling.
Key Takeaways and Future Outlook
GenAI agents are transforming objection handling in high-velocity SDR teams by surfacing new, actionable metrics.
Focusing on both quantitative and qualitative KPIs—such as objection resolution rate, time to resolution, and sentiment shift—drives better coaching, increased velocity, and more predictable pipeline outcomes.
Continuous feedback between SDRs, AI systems, and leadership is essential for maximizing GenAI value and staying ahead of evolving buyer objections.
Organizations that operationalize these metrics will enjoy a competitive edge in pipeline management and revenue generation.
Conclusion
Objection handling is a dynamic dance between SDR expertise and AI-driven enablement. By identifying and tracking the right metrics, leaders can ensure their teams are equipped to handle every objection with agility and precision. As GenAI agents become more deeply integrated into sales workflows, the ability to measure, analyze, and act on these data points will be the key differentiator in high-velocity sales environments. The future belongs to those who embrace metrics-driven, AI-augmented objection handling as a core pillar of SDR excellence.
Introduction: The Evolution of Objection Handling with GenAI
In the high-stakes world of enterprise sales, Sales Development Representatives (SDRs) operate in fast-paced environments where every interaction counts. One of the most critical aspects of their role is objection handling—a nuanced skill that can make or break a deal. With the emergence of Generative AI (GenAI) agents, the landscape of objection handling is undergoing a transformation. These AI-powered assistants not only support SDRs with real-time insights and recommended responses but also generate a new set of actionable metrics that leaders can harness to drive performance.
This article delves deep into the metrics that matter most when evaluating objection handling effectiveness in teams leveraging GenAI. By focusing on these data-driven insights, sales leaders can optimize strategies, coach teams more effectively, and ultimately accelerate pipeline velocity.
Why Metrics Matter in High-Velocity SDR Environments
High-velocity SDR teams face unique challenges: high lead volumes, rapid touch points, and the constant pressure to meet quotas. Traditional sales metrics—like call volume and conversion rates—remain important, but the integration of GenAI agents introduces new dimensions to performance measurement. Metrics now extend beyond simple activity counts to include AI-driven insights on conversation quality, objection patterns, resolution rates, and more.
Understanding and leveraging the right metrics enables managers to:
Pinpoint coaching opportunities for individual SDRs
Identify process bottlenecks and common objection themes
Refine GenAI agent prompts and algorithms for higher effectiveness
Increase pipeline velocity by reducing stalled opportunities
Core Metrics for Objection Handling with GenAI Agents
1. Objection Occurrence Rate
This metric measures how often SDRs encounter objections across all conversations. GenAI agents can automatically tag and categorize objections by type—such as budget, authority, timing, or need—providing granular visibility into the most common friction points.
Formula: (Number of objections / Total conversations) x 100
Why it matters: High occurrence rates may indicate misalignment between outreach messaging and target personas, or insufficient qualification criteria.
2. Objection Resolution Rate
This key metric tracks the percentage of objections that SDRs are able to resolve successfully with the assistance of GenAI agents. It is a direct indicator of both agent efficacy and SDR skill development.
Formula: (Number of resolved objections / Total objections) x 100
Why it matters: A rising resolution rate signals improving objection handling efficiency and, often, better pipeline progression.
3. Time to Resolution
Speed is critical in high-velocity sales. This metric measures the average time from when an objection is raised to when it is resolved, with or without GenAI intervention.
Formula: (Sum of resolution times) / (Total objections resolved)
Why it matters: Shorter resolution times typically correlate with higher SDR confidence, better GenAI recommendations, and smoother buyer experiences.
4. GenAI Recommendation Adoption Rate
Not all SDRs use GenAI-generated suggestions equally. This metric tracks the percentage of GenAI recommendations that SDRs actually use during live objection handling.
Formula: (Number of AI suggestions used / Number of AI suggestions provided) x 100
Why it matters: High adoption rates indicate trust in the AI system, while low rates may highlight training gaps or AI prompt misalignment.
5. Conversation Sentiment Shift
GenAI-powered sentiment analysis can track how the tone of a conversation changes after an objection is raised and addressed. This metric provides qualitative insight into the impact of SDR and GenAI responses.
Formula: (Average sentiment post-objection - Average sentiment pre-objection)
Why it matters: Positive sentiment shifts suggest effective handling and increased buyer trust.
6. Follow-Up Engagement Rate
After overcoming objections, the next critical step is ensuring continued buyer engagement. This metric tracks the percentage of prospects who respond positively to follow-up communications after an objection has been addressed.
Formula: (Number of positive follow-ups / Number of objections handled) x 100
Why it matters: High rates validate the effectiveness of both objection handling and subsequent nurturing strategies.
7. Coachability Index
This composite metric assesses how quickly SDRs improve objection handling skills after receiving feedback, both from managers and GenAI-driven coaching modules.
Formula: Weighted improvement across objection metrics post-coaching intervention
Why it matters: High coachability scores signal a team's readiness to adapt and drive continuous improvement.
Advanced Metrics: Unlocking Deeper Insights
8. AI-Driven Objection Pattern Recognition
GenAI agents are uniquely positioned to identify evolving objection trends over time. By clustering objection types and correlating them with outcomes, leaders can anticipate market shifts and proactively adjust messaging.
Example: An increase in budget-related objections during economic downturns.
Action: Refine value propositions and training based on emerging patterns.
9. Objection Escalation Rate
Some objections require escalation to account executives or sales engineers. Tracking the frequency and outcome of such escalations helps optimize resource allocation and highlights potential product or process gaps.
Formula: (Number of objections escalated / Total objections) x 100
Why it matters: High escalation rates may indicate complex buyer needs or insufficient SDR enablement.
10. Closed-Lost Reason Attribution
Integrating GenAI insights with CRM data allows for precise attribution of closed-lost deals to specific objection types. This metric ties objection handling effectiveness directly to revenue outcomes.
Formula: (Number of closed-losts due to specific objection / Total closed-losts) x 100
Why it matters: Provides a feedback loop for product, marketing, and enablement teams to address core issues.
11. Objection Handling Consistency Score
This metric evaluates how uniformly SDRs apply best practices and GenAI recommendations across similar objection scenarios.
Formula: Standard deviation of objection handling outcomes across team members
Why it matters: Low variance indicates strong process adherence and scalable outcomes.
Operationalizing Metrics: Best Practices for SDR Leaders
Establish Clear Baselines
Before optimizing, it’s essential to establish performance baselines for each metric. Leverage historical data and run pilot programs with GenAI agents to set realistic targets tailored to your team’s market and motion.
Integrate Metrics into Coaching Cadences
Metrics are only valuable when they inform actionable coaching. Incorporate objection handling KPIs into weekly reviews, 1:1s, and team standups. Use GenAI-generated call summaries and analytics to spotlight both strengths and blind spots for each SDR.
Align GenAI Training with Real-World Scenarios
GenAI agents are only as good as the training data and prompts they receive. Regularly update algorithms and suggested responses based on evolving objection patterns, call recordings, and SDR feedback. Encourage a feedback loop between human and AI for continuous improvement.
Drive Cross-Functional Collaboration
Share objection trend data and closed-lost reason analyses with product, marketing, and customer success teams. This enables organization-wide learning and faster iteration on messaging, product roadmap, and enablement content.
Real-World Example: Metrics in Action
A global SaaS provider implemented GenAI agents across its SDR team. By tracking objection occurrence and resolution rates, leadership identified that pricing objections spiked during Q2. Analysis revealed that GenAI suggestions for budget objections were underutilized. After refining AI prompts and coaching SDRs to better leverage recommendations, the team saw a 22% increase in objection resolution and a 15% reduction in time to resolution within two quarters. Importantly, closed-lost attribution for budget dropped by 30%, directly impacting pipeline health.
Common Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them
Overemphasizing Quantity vs. Quality: High call or objection volumes are meaningless without successful outcomes. Always pair volume metrics with effectiveness KPIs.
Neglecting AI Adoption Barriers: Low recommendation adoption rates often stem from lack of trust or poor alignment. Invest in user training and continuous AI improvement.
Failing to Close the Feedback Loop: Metrics should inform iterative changes to both AI systems and SDR processes, not just reporting dashboards.
Ignoring Sentiment and Buyer Experience: Resolution rates alone don’t capture buyer trust. Always measure sentiment shifts post-objection handling.
Key Takeaways and Future Outlook
GenAI agents are transforming objection handling in high-velocity SDR teams by surfacing new, actionable metrics.
Focusing on both quantitative and qualitative KPIs—such as objection resolution rate, time to resolution, and sentiment shift—drives better coaching, increased velocity, and more predictable pipeline outcomes.
Continuous feedback between SDRs, AI systems, and leadership is essential for maximizing GenAI value and staying ahead of evolving buyer objections.
Organizations that operationalize these metrics will enjoy a competitive edge in pipeline management and revenue generation.
Conclusion
Objection handling is a dynamic dance between SDR expertise and AI-driven enablement. By identifying and tracking the right metrics, leaders can ensure their teams are equipped to handle every objection with agility and precision. As GenAI agents become more deeply integrated into sales workflows, the ability to measure, analyze, and act on these data points will be the key differentiator in high-velocity sales environments. The future belongs to those who embrace metrics-driven, AI-augmented objection handling as a core pillar of SDR excellence.
Introduction: The Evolution of Objection Handling with GenAI
In the high-stakes world of enterprise sales, Sales Development Representatives (SDRs) operate in fast-paced environments where every interaction counts. One of the most critical aspects of their role is objection handling—a nuanced skill that can make or break a deal. With the emergence of Generative AI (GenAI) agents, the landscape of objection handling is undergoing a transformation. These AI-powered assistants not only support SDRs with real-time insights and recommended responses but also generate a new set of actionable metrics that leaders can harness to drive performance.
This article delves deep into the metrics that matter most when evaluating objection handling effectiveness in teams leveraging GenAI. By focusing on these data-driven insights, sales leaders can optimize strategies, coach teams more effectively, and ultimately accelerate pipeline velocity.
Why Metrics Matter in High-Velocity SDR Environments
High-velocity SDR teams face unique challenges: high lead volumes, rapid touch points, and the constant pressure to meet quotas. Traditional sales metrics—like call volume and conversion rates—remain important, but the integration of GenAI agents introduces new dimensions to performance measurement. Metrics now extend beyond simple activity counts to include AI-driven insights on conversation quality, objection patterns, resolution rates, and more.
Understanding and leveraging the right metrics enables managers to:
Pinpoint coaching opportunities for individual SDRs
Identify process bottlenecks and common objection themes
Refine GenAI agent prompts and algorithms for higher effectiveness
Increase pipeline velocity by reducing stalled opportunities
Core Metrics for Objection Handling with GenAI Agents
1. Objection Occurrence Rate
This metric measures how often SDRs encounter objections across all conversations. GenAI agents can automatically tag and categorize objections by type—such as budget, authority, timing, or need—providing granular visibility into the most common friction points.
Formula: (Number of objections / Total conversations) x 100
Why it matters: High occurrence rates may indicate misalignment between outreach messaging and target personas, or insufficient qualification criteria.
2. Objection Resolution Rate
This key metric tracks the percentage of objections that SDRs are able to resolve successfully with the assistance of GenAI agents. It is a direct indicator of both agent efficacy and SDR skill development.
Formula: (Number of resolved objections / Total objections) x 100
Why it matters: A rising resolution rate signals improving objection handling efficiency and, often, better pipeline progression.
3. Time to Resolution
Speed is critical in high-velocity sales. This metric measures the average time from when an objection is raised to when it is resolved, with or without GenAI intervention.
Formula: (Sum of resolution times) / (Total objections resolved)
Why it matters: Shorter resolution times typically correlate with higher SDR confidence, better GenAI recommendations, and smoother buyer experiences.
4. GenAI Recommendation Adoption Rate
Not all SDRs use GenAI-generated suggestions equally. This metric tracks the percentage of GenAI recommendations that SDRs actually use during live objection handling.
Formula: (Number of AI suggestions used / Number of AI suggestions provided) x 100
Why it matters: High adoption rates indicate trust in the AI system, while low rates may highlight training gaps or AI prompt misalignment.
5. Conversation Sentiment Shift
GenAI-powered sentiment analysis can track how the tone of a conversation changes after an objection is raised and addressed. This metric provides qualitative insight into the impact of SDR and GenAI responses.
Formula: (Average sentiment post-objection - Average sentiment pre-objection)
Why it matters: Positive sentiment shifts suggest effective handling and increased buyer trust.
6. Follow-Up Engagement Rate
After overcoming objections, the next critical step is ensuring continued buyer engagement. This metric tracks the percentage of prospects who respond positively to follow-up communications after an objection has been addressed.
Formula: (Number of positive follow-ups / Number of objections handled) x 100
Why it matters: High rates validate the effectiveness of both objection handling and subsequent nurturing strategies.
7. Coachability Index
This composite metric assesses how quickly SDRs improve objection handling skills after receiving feedback, both from managers and GenAI-driven coaching modules.
Formula: Weighted improvement across objection metrics post-coaching intervention
Why it matters: High coachability scores signal a team's readiness to adapt and drive continuous improvement.
Advanced Metrics: Unlocking Deeper Insights
8. AI-Driven Objection Pattern Recognition
GenAI agents are uniquely positioned to identify evolving objection trends over time. By clustering objection types and correlating them with outcomes, leaders can anticipate market shifts and proactively adjust messaging.
Example: An increase in budget-related objections during economic downturns.
Action: Refine value propositions and training based on emerging patterns.
9. Objection Escalation Rate
Some objections require escalation to account executives or sales engineers. Tracking the frequency and outcome of such escalations helps optimize resource allocation and highlights potential product or process gaps.
Formula: (Number of objections escalated / Total objections) x 100
Why it matters: High escalation rates may indicate complex buyer needs or insufficient SDR enablement.
10. Closed-Lost Reason Attribution
Integrating GenAI insights with CRM data allows for precise attribution of closed-lost deals to specific objection types. This metric ties objection handling effectiveness directly to revenue outcomes.
Formula: (Number of closed-losts due to specific objection / Total closed-losts) x 100
Why it matters: Provides a feedback loop for product, marketing, and enablement teams to address core issues.
11. Objection Handling Consistency Score
This metric evaluates how uniformly SDRs apply best practices and GenAI recommendations across similar objection scenarios.
Formula: Standard deviation of objection handling outcomes across team members
Why it matters: Low variance indicates strong process adherence and scalable outcomes.
Operationalizing Metrics: Best Practices for SDR Leaders
Establish Clear Baselines
Before optimizing, it’s essential to establish performance baselines for each metric. Leverage historical data and run pilot programs with GenAI agents to set realistic targets tailored to your team’s market and motion.
Integrate Metrics into Coaching Cadences
Metrics are only valuable when they inform actionable coaching. Incorporate objection handling KPIs into weekly reviews, 1:1s, and team standups. Use GenAI-generated call summaries and analytics to spotlight both strengths and blind spots for each SDR.
Align GenAI Training with Real-World Scenarios
GenAI agents are only as good as the training data and prompts they receive. Regularly update algorithms and suggested responses based on evolving objection patterns, call recordings, and SDR feedback. Encourage a feedback loop between human and AI for continuous improvement.
Drive Cross-Functional Collaboration
Share objection trend data and closed-lost reason analyses with product, marketing, and customer success teams. This enables organization-wide learning and faster iteration on messaging, product roadmap, and enablement content.
Real-World Example: Metrics in Action
A global SaaS provider implemented GenAI agents across its SDR team. By tracking objection occurrence and resolution rates, leadership identified that pricing objections spiked during Q2. Analysis revealed that GenAI suggestions for budget objections were underutilized. After refining AI prompts and coaching SDRs to better leverage recommendations, the team saw a 22% increase in objection resolution and a 15% reduction in time to resolution within two quarters. Importantly, closed-lost attribution for budget dropped by 30%, directly impacting pipeline health.
Common Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them
Overemphasizing Quantity vs. Quality: High call or objection volumes are meaningless without successful outcomes. Always pair volume metrics with effectiveness KPIs.
Neglecting AI Adoption Barriers: Low recommendation adoption rates often stem from lack of trust or poor alignment. Invest in user training and continuous AI improvement.
Failing to Close the Feedback Loop: Metrics should inform iterative changes to both AI systems and SDR processes, not just reporting dashboards.
Ignoring Sentiment and Buyer Experience: Resolution rates alone don’t capture buyer trust. Always measure sentiment shifts post-objection handling.
Key Takeaways and Future Outlook
GenAI agents are transforming objection handling in high-velocity SDR teams by surfacing new, actionable metrics.
Focusing on both quantitative and qualitative KPIs—such as objection resolution rate, time to resolution, and sentiment shift—drives better coaching, increased velocity, and more predictable pipeline outcomes.
Continuous feedback between SDRs, AI systems, and leadership is essential for maximizing GenAI value and staying ahead of evolving buyer objections.
Organizations that operationalize these metrics will enjoy a competitive edge in pipeline management and revenue generation.
Conclusion
Objection handling is a dynamic dance between SDR expertise and AI-driven enablement. By identifying and tracking the right metrics, leaders can ensure their teams are equipped to handle every objection with agility and precision. As GenAI agents become more deeply integrated into sales workflows, the ability to measure, analyze, and act on these data points will be the key differentiator in high-velocity sales environments. The future belongs to those who embrace metrics-driven, AI-augmented objection handling as a core pillar of SDR excellence.
Be the first to know about every new letter.
No spam, unsubscribe anytime.